[108] Drugs to avoid

[108] Drugs to avoid

In two previous Therapeutics Letters we presented Clinical Pearls from Prescrire International.1,2 Prescrire is one of a small number of drug bulletins in the world, which reports on prescription drugs and is completely independent of industry influence. The front page of Prescrire International states, “Funded by subscribers. No advertising, no grants, no shareholders.” The inside jacket documents the large number of contributors and the processes whereby they prevent conflicts: “Members of the Prescrire Editorial Staff sign a yearly declaration of absence of conflicts of interest, in accordance with Prescrire’s ’Non merci…’ Charter.”

In April 2017 Prescrire published their latest “Drugs to avoid: 2017 update”.3 This update represents an assessment, based on a rigorous procedure, of the harm-benefit balance of drugs and indications. This fifth annual review of drugs to avoid includes all medicines examined by Prescrire between 2010 and 2017 and authorized in the European Union. It identifies 91 drugs that are more harmful than beneficial. The full 10-page version is freely available.4

The Tables provided here include only the drugs on the Prescrire list that are currently available in Canada. The Tables also include the indications, a summary of the reasons to avoid and Prescrire’s suggestions of better alternatives. For ease of reference we have divided the list into drugs prescribed for prevention (Table 1) and drugs prescribed for treatment (Table 2).

Table 1: Drugs to avoid prescribed for prevention

Drug (Brand) Indication Reason(s) to avoid Better alternative(s)
Aliskiren (Rasilez) High blood pressure Not shown to reduce cardiovascular events Thiazide, ACE inhibitors
Bezafibrate (Bezalip) Elevated lipids  Not shown to reduce cardiovascular events Gemfibrozil
Fenofibrate (Lipidil) Elevated lipids  Not shown to reduce cardiovascular events Gemfibrozil
Dronedarone (Multaq) Anti-arrhythmic  Less effective than amiodarone Amiodarone
Ivabradine (Lancora) Heart failure  Toxicity such as myocardial infarction and severe bradycardia; no advantages Beta blockers
Olmesartan (Olmetec) High blood pressure  Possible sprue-like enteropathy Other angiotensin receptor blockers 
Gliptins: Alogliptin (Nesina), Linagliptin (Trajenta), Saxigliptin (Onglyza), Sitagliptin (Januvia) Type 2 diabetes Unfavorable adverse effect profile such as anaphylaxis and pancreatitis  Metformin, sulfonylureas
Flozins: Canagliflozin (Invokana), Dapagliflozin (Forxiga) Type 2 diabetes  Adverse effects such as hypotension and genital infections Metformin, sulfonylureas
Pioglitazone (Actos) Type 2 diabetes Adverse effects such as heart failure and bone fractures Metformin, sulfonylureas
Orlistat (Xenical) Weight loss No long-term effectiveness; adverse effects such as severe diarrhoea and malnutrition  Diet and exercise
Denosumab (Prolia) Osteoporosis Modest efficacy; disproportionate adverse effects such as back pain and serious infections  Weight bearing exercise

Table 2: Drugs to avoid prescribed for treatment

Drug (Brand) Indication Reason(s) to avoid Better alternative(s)
Domperidone Vomiting, upper GI hypomotility  Cardiac dysrhythmias Metoclopramide
Prucalopride (Resotran) Chronic idiopathic constipation  Uncharacterized adverse effect profile Other laxatives
Moxifloxacin Bacterial infections Serious toxicity such as liver and cardiac disorders  Ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin
Donepezil (Aricept), Galantamine (Reminyl), Rivastigmine (Exelon), Memantine Alzheimer’s and other dementias Minimal efficacy; disproportionate adverse effects such as severe vomiting and syncope  Support from caregivers and family
Alemtuzumab (Lemtrada), Natalizumab (Tysabri), Teriflunomide (Aubagio) Multiple sclerosis Disproportionate adverse effects such as infections and liver damage  Interferon beta
Olaparib (Lynparza) Advanced ovarian cancer Not shown to prolong survival; serious adverse effects  Appropriate supportive care
Trabectedin (Yondelis) Ovarian cancer, soft-tissue sarcoma No tangible efficacy; severe adverse effects such as diarrhoea and liver damage  Appropriate supportive care
Duloxetine (Cymbalta) Depression Unacceptable risk of cardiac and liver toxicity Other antidepressants
Citalopram (Celexa), Escitalopram (Cipralex) Depression Risk of QT prolongation Other antidepressants
Venlafaxine (Effexor) Depression Risk of cardiac disorders Other antidepressants
Bupropion (Zyban) Smoking cessation Risk of neuropsychiatric disorders Nicotine
Oral or Nasal Decongestants: Pseudoephedrine, Naphazoline, Phenylephrine Allergic or viral rhinitis Serious cardiovascular disorders Conservative measures
Omalizumab (Xolair), Mepolizumab (Nucala) Severe asthma, chronic idiopathic urticaria Disproportionate adverse effects Corticosteroids
Nintedanib (Ofev) Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis No survival benefit; serious liver damage and thromboembolism Symptomatic treatment
NSAIDs: Celecoxib (Celebrex), Diclofenac (Voltaren), Ketoprofen, Piroxicam Pain and inflammation Unacceptable additional adverse effects such as myocardial infarction and skin reactions   Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, Naproxen (lowest dose for shortest period)
Glucosamine Osteoarthritis Not effective; rare allergic reactions Appropriate exercise
Capsaicin topical) Pain Limited effectiveness; irritations and burns  Other analgesics
Methocarbamol (Robaxin) Muscle relaxant No proven efficacy; gastrointestinal and skin adverse effects  Acetaminophen
Quinine Muscle cramps Poor efficacy; risk of life-threatening adverse effects  Regular stretching

Prescrire’s conclusions

  • “91 authorised drugs more dangerous than beneficial”
  • “This review lists drugs that have an unfavourable harm-benefit balance in all their authorized indications, in other words drugs that should be removed from the market on account of their toxicity.”

From a Canadian perspective the good news is that 44 (48%) of the 91 drugs to avoid are available in Europe and are not available in Canada.

The draft of this Therapeutics Letter was submitted for review to 65 experts and primary care physicians in order to correct any inaccuracies and to ensure that the information is concise and relevant to clinicians.
The Therapeutics Initiative is funded by the BC Ministry of Health through a grant to the University of BC. The Therapeutics Initiative provides evidence-based advice about drug therapy, and is not responsible for formulating or adjudicating provincial drug policies.
ISSN 2369-8691 (Online) <||> ISSN 2369-8683 (Print)

References

  1. Therapeutics Initiative. Clinical pearls from Prescrire. Therapeutics Letter. 2006 (Oct-Dec); 60:1-2. [LINK]
  2. Therapeutics Initiative. Clinical pearls from Prescrire. Therapeutics Letter. 2012 (Jan-Mar); 85:1-2. [LINK]
  3. Prescrire Editorial Staff. Drugs to avoid: 2017 update. Prescrire Int 2017; 26 (181):108-111. [LINK]
  4. Prescrire Editorial Staff. Towards better patient care. Drugs to avoid in 2017. Rev Prescrire 2017; 37 (400): 137-148. [LINK]
ERRATUM: We have removed cyclosporine eye drops (Restasis) from Table 2. The Prescrire article referred to Ikervis, a 0.1% cyclosporine solution. Restasis is a 0.05% cyclosporine solution.
We have experienced many responses and comments to this Letter. We very much appreciate feedback. In this instance since the Letter represents a republication of Prescrire’s work we have encouraged individuals who disagreed with the content to send feedback to Prescrire.
9 Comments
  • Hugh Paton
    Posted at 08:23h, 05 January Reply

    Great information, helpful to me as a benefit plan consultant, thank you very much!

  • Bob Paddock
    Posted at 09:08h, 05 January Reply

    Why only one Fluoroquinolone on the list? FDA says they have killed 3000 and injured 200000. That is believed to be only one percent of the real numbers.
    Please have issue #109 address Fluoroquinolones. Please.
    Thank you.

    • n
      Posted at 23:28h, 21 June Reply

      10 yrs after short course on cipro, and achilles tendon damage still a big problem.

  • Hans Baer
    Posted at 11:18h, 05 January Reply

    Great information! Thanks.

  • Peter Boronowski
    Posted at 19:52h, 08 January Reply

    Thank you for this list. I subscribe to “Best Pills Worst Pills” and it is good but not like Prescrire.

  • Ben Addleman
    Posted at 15:19h, 11 January Reply

    Interesting they list most meds for T2DM except metformin and sulfonylureas. I’m not convinced sulfonylureas do much good for the patient with diabetes since there’s evidence of increased cardiovascular events. I also do see some very commonly prescribed meds (olmetec, Cymbalta, Effexor, citalopram and its popular but unnecessary enantiomer escitalopram). This list could ruffle some feathers!

  • Richard Bray
    Posted at 00:37h, 01 February Reply

    Yes, I agree with Mr. Addleman that Cymbalta, Effexor, Celexa, and Ecsitalolpram will most certainly ruffle many feathers in my workworld!
    A must read for anyone interested in the many dangers of industry is: Deadly Medicines and Organized Crime. A very valuable scientific piece of work!

  • David Kendler
    Posted at 14:38h, 11 April Reply

    Denosumab for the prevention of osteoporosis?? This is not an indication anywhere in the world! This product is indicated for the treatment of patients at high risk of fracture (including men, women, glucocorticoid, aromatase inhibitor, androgen deprivation). Clinical trials do not substantiate any increases in overall infection or back pain. Where is the TI or Prescrire review of evidence of exercise efficacy in the prevention of fracture? Certainly this evidence is much less robust than that achieved by large randomized controlled drug trials!

    • Alan Cassels @ TI
      Posted at 16:04h, 23 July Reply

      A very good suggestion. I think that reviewing the literature on the efficacy of exercise in preventing fractures is a very worthwhile goal.
      cheers, Alan Cassels, Communications Director.

Post A Reply to Hans Baer Cancel Reply