[145] Minimizing inhaled corticosteroids for COPD

[145] Minimizing inhaled corticosteroids for COPD

Jump to: Abstract | Full Text | Plain Language Summary | Infographic | Conclusions | References


Plain Language Summary

infographic

click on the image to view high resolution version of the infographic

What is Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)?
COPD can become a serious lung condition that makes it hard to breathe. Airways in the lungs get inflamed and narrow, making it difficult for air to flow in and out.

What causes COPD?
The main cause is smoking cigarettes. Breathing in air pollution or chemical fumes can also be harmful.

How can we help people with COPD?
There are medicines that can help with COPD. They don’t help over time if people continue to smoke. The medicines can help improve symptoms so that people can be more active and healthier.

What about inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)?
Because inhalers improved breathing in asthma, doctors thought ICS might be helpful for COPD. Studies later showed that ICS did not improve either symptoms or quality of life. They did not increase the chances of living longer. ICS can also have serious side effects including pneumonia and bone-thinning leading to fracture risk. Although ICS may improve asthma symptoms, COPD is a different illness and they don’t help.

Who should use ICS?
Now, doctors are asked to only prescribe ICS in the most severe cases of COPD. In most cases, different medicines are used that widen the airways and help you breathe (bronchodilators).

Are there risks with using ICS?
Yes. Even short-term use of ICS can lead to an increased risk of both pneumonia and fractures from bone-thinning.

What should doctors do?
For milder COPD cases, patients should start and be limited to bronchodilators. For advanced cases, with severe shortness of breath, or if there are have been infections and hospitalizations, then ICS could be added. For people with milder disease who have been prescribed ICS in the past, doctors should try to gradually stop ICS.

Conclusions:
For most people with COPD, studies show that the harms from using ICS outweigh the benefits.


Abstract

Background: Therapeutics Letter 145 considers the evidence for inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as a treatment for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). This condition is characterized by airway inflammation and irreversible airflow obstruction that causes significant respiratory symptoms and reduced quality of life. Cigarette smoking is the main cause. Stopping smoking helps symptoms and slows disease progression and improves symptoms. Drug therapy aims to alleviate symptoms, enhance functional capacity and prevent exacerbations, but has not shown by randomized trials to reduce mortality or improve quality of life.

Findings: ICS have shown limited benefits for COPD symptoms and exacerbations but increased risks of serious harms. Guidelines recommend limiting ICS to severe COPD and only for repeated exacerbations. Studies show withdrawing ICS can be done safely for stable COPD patients with infrequent exacerbations, especially those with lower eosinophil counts. Provincial, national, and international guidelines now recommend limiting ICS prescriptions to severe COPD stages. Long-term ICS use may lead to serious side effects, including pneumonia and fractures.

Conclusions: Initial COPD therapy should focus on short-acting bronchodilators, not ICS. Adding long-acting bronchodilators is recommended before considering ICS due to limited benefits and risks of serious harms. For persistent symptoms, long-acting muscarinic agonists or long-acting beta agonists are recommended, with the addition of ICS reserved for those with repeated exacerbations. Deprescribing ICS can be considered in clinically stable patients, particularly for those with infrequent exacerbations. When applicable, tapering ICS over several months is advised for patients with elevated eosinophil counts. Overall, the risks of serious harms from ICS typically outweigh their limited benefits for COPD patients.


Minimizing inhaled corticosteroids for COPD

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is characterized by airway inflammation and irreversible airflow obstruction that cause shortness of breath, cough, and excess mucus production, reducing quality of life. Permanent anatomical changes make bronchodilators less effective for COPD than for asthma.

Cigarette smoking is the principal cause, although long-term exposure to other lung irritants (including air pollution) also contributes. Stopping smoking improves symptoms, and is the only effective strategy to slow disease progression and reduce premature mortality.1

Acute exacerbations of COPD and bronchitis, typically due to infection, ranked second only to childbirth as a cause of hospitalization in Canada in 2018-2019, exceeding heart failure and myocardial infarction.2 By 2020-2021, they ranked eighth (after COVID-19), but still over 47,000 admissions/year. In British Columbia their ranking declines, overshadowed by substance use disorders and major mental illness.3

Clinical goals of drug therapy are to reduce symptoms, improve functional capacity, and prevent exacerbations. Drug therapy has not been shown to reduce mortality.4

Inhaled corticosteroids: the evidence

Recognizing their efficacy for asthma, doctors began to prescribe inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for COPD in the 1980’s, without evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs).5 Two decades later, RCTs had shown no mortality benefit from ICS compared with placebo, no reduction in the proportion of people experiencing an exacerbation, and no improvement in quality of life.6-8 A possible explanation is that while corticosteroids potently suppress eosinophilic airway inflammation in asthma, the neutrophilic inflammatory process in COPD is typically steroid resistant.5

Provincial, national and international guidelines all recommend limiting prescription of ICS to the most severe stages of COPD.9-11 During 2017-21, 51,128 British Columbians initiated drug therapy for COPD, of whom 27% received an ICS alone or in combination. This proportion was stable over the 5 years.12 It is lower than in a large United Kingdom sample, in which 47% of COPD patients still received ICS as a component of initial daily drug therapy during 2015 (down from 77% in 2005).13

Serious harms from chronic inhaled corticosteroid use include pneumonia and fractures,14 updated here from an unpublished 2020 TI meta-analysis.15

RR: relative risk;   ARI: absolute risk increase;   NNH: number needed to harm;
* independent of ICS dose, duration, or baseline severity of COPD

COPD guidelines discourage routine ICS prescription

Rational drug therapy employs the simplest and least expensive treatment to achieve individual therapeutic goals. For initial therapy, BC (2020) and Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD, 2022) guidelines recommend short-acting beta agonists (SABA) or short-acting muscarinic antagonists (SAMA) to relieve shortness of breath.9,11

For worsening symptoms or to reduce exacerbations, both recommend short and then long-acting bronchodilators (beta agonists/LABA or muscarinic antagonists/LAMA), alone or in combination.

To LAMA + LABA, add ICS at the lowest possible dose only for people who continue to experience repeated exacerbations. GOLD and a 2020 Cochrane systematic review point out that no “escalation” strategy has been tested in RCTs,11,16 while deprescribing ICS has been tested.

Can ICS be deprescribed safely?

Two recent manufacturer-funded studies evaluated ICS withdrawal, focusing on acute exacerbations, the most relevant clinical issue. Amongst 2,488 people with severe – very severe COPD who were susceptible to exacerbations, WISDOM (2014) compared triple therapy for up to 1 year (tiotropium 18 mcg/d + salmeterol 50 mcg twice/d + fluticasone 500 mcg twice/d) with gradual withdrawal of fluticasone over a 12-week period (followed by LAMA/LABA alone).17 Moderate or severe exacerbations were similar among people who discontinued or continued ICS therapy (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.19). There were no clinically important between-group differences in symptoms, quality of life or safety. No patient subgroup had increased likelihood of exacerbations after stopping ICS.

Amongst 1,053 people without frequent exacerbations, SUNSET (2018) compared continued triple therapy for up to 26 weeks (tiotropium 18 mcg/d + salmeterol 50 mcg / fluticasone 500 mcg twice/d) with abrupt discontinuation of ICS after long-term triple therapy, replaced by once daily LAMA/LABA (indacaterol 110 mcg / glycopyrronium 50 mcg).18 Annualized moderate or severe exacerbations did not differ between treatments (rate ratio 1.08; 95% CI 0.83 to 1.40). There was no difference in the time to first moderate or severe COPD exacerbation (hazard ratio 1.11; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.46).

SUNSET is the only RCT to report a pre-specified analysis of patient subgroups defined by baseline blood eosinophil counts, one approach to differentiating COPD (<300 cells/µL) from asthma (≥300 cells/µL). When baseline eosinophil count was <300/µL (COPD), stopping ICS made no difference to the rate of moderate or severe exacerbations, nor the time to exacerbation. In contrast, in people with baseline eosinophils ≥300/µL (asthma/COPD overlap), stepdown to LAMA/LABA alone increased moderate or severe exacerbations vs. continuing ICS over 6 months (rate ratio 1.86; 95% CI 1.06 to 3.29).

Conclusions

  • Short-acting bronchodilators (SABA or SAMA), but not ICS, remain initial drug therapy for COPD.
  • For persistent symptoms or exacerbations, adding LAMA or LABA, then LAMA + LABA, is recommended (but this strategy has not been tested in RCTs).
  • For most people with COPD, the increased risk of serious harms from ICS outweighs the limited known benefits for symptoms or exacerbations.
  • It is reasonable to try stopping ICS in clinically stable patients with infrequent exacerbations. For patients with eosinophils above 300/µL in a complete blood count, first taper ICS over a few months.

Portrait

The Therapeutics Initiative produced and distributed personalized Portraits on prescribing of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (2017-2021) to approximately 5000 clinicians in BC. Eligible clinicians (primary care physicians and nurse practitioners) were randomized to receive the Portrait in two groups, an early group of clinicians received Portrait in December 2022 and a delayed group received Portrait in December 2023.

A sample Portrait (with fictitious data) is freely available at: https://ti.ubc.ca/portrait-ics

BC primary care physicians and nurse practitioners can sign up on a secure platform to access their own personalized prescribing Portraits (8 topics currently available and more are being produced). If you qualify and have already signed up, log in to view your Portraits.


Several BC experts reviewed the draft of this Therapeutics Letter for factual accuracy, and to ensure it is relevant to clinicians.
The UBC TI is funded by the BC Ministry of Health to provide evidence-based information about drug therapy. We neither formulate nor adjudicate provincial drug policies.
ISSN: 2369-8691
International Society of Drug Bulletin LogoThe Therapeutics Letter is a member of the International Society of Drug Bulletins (ISDB), a world-wide network of independent drug bulletins that aims to promote international exchange of quality information on drugs and therapeutics.

References

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Smoking Cessation. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2020 https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/2020-cessation-sgr-full-report.pdf
    2. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Inpatient Hospitalization, Surgery and Newborn Statistics, 2018-2019. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2020. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/dad-hmdb-childbirth-quick-stats-2018-2019-en-web.xlsx
    3. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Inpatient Hospitalization, Surgery and Newborn Statistics, 2020-2021. Ottawa, ON: CIHI; 2022. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/dad-hmdb-childbirth-2020-2021-data-tables-en.xlsx
    4. Therapeutics Initiative. Update of Provincial Academic Detailing Service (PAD) Literature Review: Inhaled medications for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Feb. 28, 2019. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/health-drug-coverage/pharmacare/2019-02-28_ubc_ti_report_copd.pdf
    5. Suissa S, Barnes PJ. Inhaled corticosteroids in COPD: the case against. European Respiratory Journal 2009;34(1):13-6. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00190908
    6. Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, et al. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2007;356(8):775-89. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa063070
    7. Aaron SD, Vandemheen KL, Fergusson D, et al. Tiotropium in combination with placebo, salmeterol, or fluticasone- salmeterol for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized trial. Annals of Internal Medicine 2007;146(8):545-55. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-8-200704170-00152
    8. BC Provincial Academic Detailing Service. COPD Update: Focus on Intensifying LABA, LAMA and ICS Therapy. 2017. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/practitioner-pro/provincial-academic-detailing-service/copd_update.pdf
    9. Guidelines and Protocols and Advisory Committee (GPAC). Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Diagnosis and Management. Effective Date: February 22nd, 2017 Revised Date: Medication table updated July 2020. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/health/practitioner-professional-resources/bc-guidelines/copd
    10. Bourbeau J, Bhutani M, Hernandez P, et al. Canadian Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline on pharmacotherapy in patients with COPD – 2019 update of evidence. Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine 2019;3(4):210-232. DOI: 10.1080/24745332.2019.1668652
    11. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2023. Available from: https://goldcopd.org
    12. Therapeutics Initiative. Analysis of PharmaNet data. Sept 2022 (unpublished).
    13. Chalmers JD, Tebboth A, Gayle A, et al. Determinants of initial inhaled corticosteroid use in patients with GOLD A/B COPD: a retrospective study of UK general practice. NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine. 2017;27(1):43. DOI: 10.1038/s41533-017-0040-z
    14. Kew KM, Seniukovich A. Inhaled steroids and risk of pneumonia for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD010115. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010115.pub2
    15. Therapeutics Initiative. ICS Meta-analysis 2020 (manuscript in preparation for publication).
    16. Tan J, White J, Walters JAE, Walters EH. Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 11. Art. No.: CD011600. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011600.pub2
    17. Magnussen H, Disse B, Rodriguez-Roisin R, et al. Withdrawal of inhaled glucocorticoids and exacerbations of COPD. New England Journal of Medicine 2014;371(14):1285-94; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407154
    18. Chapman KR, Hurst JR, Frent SM, et al. Long-term Triple Therapy De-escalation to Indacaterol/Glycopyrronium in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (SUNSET): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Triple-Dummy Clinical Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2018;198(3):329-339. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201803-0405OC
2 Comments
  • Dr. Shannon L. Walker
    Posted at 16:44h, 01 February Reply

    This Therapeutics Letter does not align with current recommendations from the updated 2023 Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline on the Pharmaceutical Management of Stable COPD.[1] Risk reduction is the goal of current COPD approach. The CTS guideline advocates an aggressive evidence based approach to reduce symptoms and risk of exacerbations by assessment of a patient’s current burden of symptoms and risk for further exacerbations. The guideline recommends an escalated approach that includes long acting bronchodilators even in earlier or milder disease, and recommends ICS/bronchodilator combination inhalers for higher risk patients supported by 2 recent large randomized controlled trials showing reduced primary outcome of moderate and severe exacerbations (NNT=4) with a low rate of pneumonia and reduced mortality (secondary outcome).

    Shannon Louise Walker MD, FRCPC (Respiratory and Internal Medicine)
    Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, UBC
    Medical Director, Community Respiratory Services, South Okanagan Respiratory Department

    References
    1. Bourbeau, J., Bhutani, M., Hernandez, P., Aaron, S. D., Beauchesne, M. F., B. Kermelly, S., … Marciniuk, D. D. (2023). 2023 Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline on Pharmacotherapy in Patients with Stable COPD. Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, 7(4), 173–191. DOI: 10.1080/24745332.2023.2231451

    Conflict of Interest Disclosure
    Dr. Walker provided a standard International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, summarized below.

    Dr. Walker has disclosed receiving payments or honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boerhinger Ingelheim, GSK, Pfizer for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus and CME development, as well as support for attending meetings and/or travel.
    Dr. Walker has disclosed participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board: the Polypharmacy Risk Reduction Steering Committee, Doctors of BC.
    Dr. Walker has disclosed a leadership or fiduciary role in: Canadian Thoracic Society – Chair of Membership and Board of Directors 2006-2012 (voluntary role).

    • Thomas L. Perry MD, FRCPC
      Posted at 18:09h, 26 June Reply

      We thank Dr. Walker for this comment and apologize for the delay in responding. We finalized Therapeutics Letter 145 in late 2022, before publication of the 2023 Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline (CTS 2023) referenced by Dr. Walker.[1] We referred to conclusions of the 2022 GOLD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease) international guideline, and updated the reference to 2023 because GOLD published a minor revision in 2023. CTS 2023 discusses some differences between its conclusions and recommendations from those offered by GOLD 2023. The GOLD guideline was updated again in late 2023, for 2024.[2] Changes are minimal from 2023 regard to bronchodilator and inhaler therapy. The latest GOLD report recommends consideration of triple therapy with ICS for people in “Group E” who experience ≥ 2 moderate exacerbations or > 1 leading to hospitalization, and who have a blood eosinophil count ≥ 300.[3]

      The operative statement from CTS 2023 to which Dr. Walker refers is this:
      “The number needed to treat (NNT) has been established at 4 patients for 1 year to prevent 1 moderate to severe exacerbation with Triple Therapy versus combined inhaled long-acting dual bronchodilator therapy, and the number needed to harm (NNH) at 33 patients for 1 year to cause 1 pneumonia.”

      CTS 2023 more strongly supports inhaled corticosteroid treatment for COPD patients than does the international GOLD guideline, updated in 2023 and 2024. Therapeutics Letter 145 noted that GOLD 2023 concluded with respect to newly diagnosed patients with COPD:
      “There is no high-quality evidence such as randomized controlled trials to support initial pharmacological treatment strategies in newly diagnosed COPD patients.”
      “We are fully aware that treatment escalation has not been systematically tested; trials of de-escalation are also limited and only include ICS.”

      The GOLD 2024 update reiterates the first conclusion above.

      To support its more enthusiastic recommendation of triple inhaler therapy, CTS 2023 cites a 2021 secondary publication [4] of the IMPACT trial, which was first published in 2018.[5] However, neither the cited reference nor an online Supplement [6] refer to a “number needed to treat” or “NNT.”

      We have sought clarification from the lead author of the CTS 2023 guideline, who is also a member of the international GOLD Science Committee (2023), and received some information that we are continuing to evaluate.

      In 2018, the Drug Assessment Working Group (DAWG) of the Therapeutics Initiative critically appraised the original IMPACT trial of fluticasone/umeclidinium/vilanterol (Trelegy Elipta) vs. fluticasone/vilanterol and umeclidinium/vilanterol. Our assessment from 2018 is posted on the TI website.[7] Based on a detailed assessment of the IMPACT trial, we concluded in 2018:
      “There is insufficient evidence that triple therapy with FF/UMEC/VI provides therapeutic advantage versus dual therapy (FF/VI or UMEC/VI) in terms of mortality, total serious adverse events (which includes all cause hospitalization and hospitalization due to severe exacerbation), moderate exacerbations, total adverse events or withdrawal due to adverse events, COPD symptoms or quality of life.”

      A 2019 DAWG report updated comparison of various other combination therapies (but not triple therapy) drawing similar conclusions.[8]

      On December 6, 2023, an updated Cochrane Systematic Review (SR) from the Cochrane Airways Group was published, after we finalized TL 145.[9] The updated Cochrane SR and the Canadian Thoracic Society guideline both conclude that single inhaler triple therapy reduced moderate-to-severe exacerbations and total mortality (all cause mortality) in high risk COPD patients. The difference between their findings is mainly in the perceived certainty of this evidence. The Cochrane SR authors disclose no conflicts of interest,[9] whereas the CTS 2023 authors report many.[1] An important remaining distinction is between people with COPD who also have features of asthma (often accompanied by peripheral blood eosinophilia), versus those who do not.

      The 2023 Cochrane SR interpretation of the available data is more cautious than CTS 2023, as reflected in its key conclusions:
      “The available evidence suggests that triple therapy may reduce rates of COPD exacerbations (low‐certainty evidence) and results in an improvement in health‐related quality of life (high‐certainty evidence) compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers, but probably confers an increased pneumonia risk as a serious adverse event (moderate‐certainty evidence).”
      “Triple therapy may reduce the risk of all‐cause mortality compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers (low‐certainty evidence). The certainty of the evidence was downgraded most frequently for inconsistency or indirectness.”
      “We found limited data on the effects of triple therapy compared to combination LABA/LAMA inhalers in patients with mild‐moderate COPD and those without a recent exacerbation history.”

      We find that critical appraisal and interpretation of the key randomized clinical trials (IMPACT, first reported 2018; ETHOS, first reported 2020) is complex and challenging. Both large 52-week RCTs were sponsored, designed, by the commercial sponsors, who also analyzed the data and produced the initial drafts of the published reports.[5],[10]

      We are updating our 2018 Drug Assessment Working Group report on triple therapy, and will post it to our website, once completed.

      To prove the optimum initial strategy for inhaled drug treatment after diagnosis of COPD would probably require a publicly financed large randomized controlled trial that could assess multiple aspects of the disease, including disease progression, functional status (e.g. work, recreation), disability status, medical costs, hospitalizations, and premature death.

      All Therapeutics Letters attempt to provide a rigorous analysis of available evidence that leads to practical conclusions relevant to primary care. They are not intended to suggest how any clinician should manage specific individual patients, let alone advise specialists how to care for people with particularly advanced disease. We again thank Dr. Walker for her comment, and also Dr. Jean Bourbeau of McGill University for providing us with additional insights about the differences in data interpretation between CTS 2023, Cochrane SR 2023, and GOLD 2023 and 2024.

      Benji Heran PhD [no conflict of interest]
      Thomas L. Perry MD, FRCPC [no conflict of interest]
      Ken Bassett MD, PhD [no conflict of interest]

      References
      1. Bourbeau, J., Bhutani, M., Hernandez, P., Aaron, S. D., Beauchesne, M. F., B. Kermelly, S., … Marciniuk, D. D. (2023). 2023 Canadian Thoracic Society Guideline on Pharmacotherapy in Patients with Stable COPD. Canadian Journal of Respiratory, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, 7(4), 173–191. DOI: 10.1080/24745332.2023.2231451
      2. GOLD 2024 report. https://goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report/
      3. GOLD 2024 report. p. 48 (Figure 3.7) https://goldcopd.org/2024-gold-report/
      4. Dransfield MT, Crim C, Criner GJ, Day NC, Halpin DMG, Han MK, Jones CE, Kilbride S, LaFon D, Lipson DA, Lomas DA, Martin N, Martinez FJ, Singh D, Wise RA, Lange P. Risk of Exacerbation and Pneumonia with Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in IMPACT. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):788-798. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-096OC PMID: 33108212 PMCID: PMC8086537
      5. Lipson DA, Barnhart CVM, Brealey N, et al. Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1671-1680. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713901
      6. Dransfield MT, Crim C, Criner GJ, Day NC, Halpin DMG, Han MK, Jones CE, Kilbride S, LaFon D, Lipson DA, Lomas DA, Martin N, Martinez FJ, Singh D, Wise RA, Lange P. Risk of Exacerbation and Pneumonia with Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in IMPACT. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 May;18(5):788-798. Online Supplement: https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/suppl/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202002-096OC/suppl_file/dransfield_data_supplement.pdf
      7. Therapeutics Initiative. TRELEGY ELLIPTA single inhaler triple therapy for treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Systematic review report; September 12, 2018. https://www.ti.ubc.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Trelegy-Ellipta-Sep-2018.pdf
      8. Therapeutics Initiative. Update of PAD Literature Review: Inhaled medications for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Therapeutics Initiative report; February 28, 2019. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/health/health-drug-coverage/pharmacare/2019-02-28_ubc_ti_report_copd.pdf
      9. van Geffen WH, Tan DJ, Walters JAE, Walters EH. Inhaled corticosteroids with combination inhaled long‐acting beta2‐agonists and long‐acting muscarinic antagonists for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2023, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD011600. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011600.pub3
      10. Rabe KF, Martinez FJ, Fergusun GT et al. Triple Inhaled Therapy at Two Glucocorticoid Doses in Moderate-to-Very Severe COPD. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:35-48. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1916046

Post A Comment